ANALISIS NETWORK PLANNING MENGGUNAKAN CRITICAL PATH METHOD PADA PRODUKSI JOINT BRAKE ROD

  • Davina Argadiraksa Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Dene Herwanto Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
Keywords: Project, Critical Path Method, Network Planning

Abstract

The production process is very influential for the company, because it can provide profits from a production. If scheduling planning is not available, project activities will be delayed and less effective and project activities will be inefficient. Scheduling planning is optimal by applying the Critical Path Method (CPM). The advantage of the Critical Path Method (CPM) is that it can provide a list of project activities that are detrimental to the schedule, can set a schedule, identify important elements in a project, and find critical paths. This study aims to analyze component production scheduling and find critical paths of Joint Brake Rod component production activities by applying the Critical Path Method (CPM). This study obtained the results of the production time of Joint Brake Rod components by applying the Critical Path Method (CPM) is 37,953 seconds to produce products, where previously the company had time before applying the Critical Path Method (CPM) was 39,153 seconds. From the results of calculations before and after applying the method, this time decrease was 3.06%. In applying the Critical Path Method (CPM), an overview of the critical trajectory of network planning is obtained.

References

Eelaiwi, Ala H. 2018. “Article Id: Ijmet_09_11_006 Cite This Article: Ala H. Elaiwi, Efficiency Of Critical Path Method (Cpm) And Pert Technique For Yacht Construction.” International Journal Of Mechanical Engineering And Technology (Ijmet 9(11):48–54.

Feradhita. 2021. “Project Management Body Of Knowledge Guide.” Logique.

Haron, Norizah, Wan Suryani, Wan Awang, Zarina Mohamad, Fadhilah Ahmad, Nurnadiah Zamri, Ahmad Nazari, Mohd Rose, And Mustafa Mat Deris. 2017. “A Practical Approach Using Cpm/Pert: For Certain Activity Times In Construction Parking Project.” World Applied Sciences Journal 35(7):1180–84. Doi: 10.5829/Idosi.Wasj.2017.1180.1184.

Karabulut, Mertcan. 2017. “Application Of Monte Carlo Simulation And Pert/Cpm Techniques In Planning Of Construction Projects: A Case Study.” Periodicals Of Engineering And Natural Sciences 5(3):409–20. Doi: 10.21533/Pen.V5i3.152.

Lubis, Riani, And Sufa Atin. 2019. “Implementation Of Critical Path Method In Project Planning And Scheduling.” Iop Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng 662, No. 2. Doi: 10.1088/1757- 899x/662/2/022031.

Masahengke, Fredy. 2018. “Manajemen Produksi Dan Komunikasi Program Komedi Baelang (Studi Kasus Di Lpp Tvri Kalimantan Timur).” Jurnal Komunikasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen 5(1):134–60.

Perdana, Surya, And Arif Rahman. 2019. “Penerapan Manajemen Proyek Dengan Metode Cpm (Critical Path Method) Pada Proyek Pembangunan Spbe.” Amaliah: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 3(1):242–50. Doi: 10.32696/Ajpkm.V3i1.235.

Rudiawan, Hendri. 2021. “Peranan Manajemen Produksi Dalam Menyelaraskan Kinerja Perusahaan.” 9(2):66–71.

Supriyanto, Erlian. 2020. “Manufaktur Dalam Dunia Teknik Industri.” Jurnal Industri Elektro Dan Penerbangan 3(3):1.

Telaumbanua, Tommy Aro, Jantje B. Mangare, And Mochtar Sibi. 2017. “Modisland Manado Dengan Metode CPM.” Jurnal Sipil Statik 5(8):549–57.

Published
2023-06-06
Section
Articles